Posts tagged uniformity of nature
The Groundless Faith of Atheism: Why It Can’t Justify Logic or Science
The Groundless Faith of Atheism: Why It Can’t Justify Logic or Science

Atheists say they trust in reason, science, and morality—but on what basis? In this article, I expose how these very tools presuppose the God of Scripture. From logic to ethics to the scientific method itself, every step rests on truths only the Christian worldview can account for. This isn’t just theology—it’s a total worldview checkmate.

Read More
Apologetics, DebateJoel SettecasePresuppositional apologetics, Christian worldview, debate with atheist, Mark Reid atheist, transcendental argument for God, impossibility of the contrary, laws of logic and God, science and Christianity, biblical epistemology, atheism refuted, Van Til apologetics, Greg Bahnsen style debate, Christian apologetics, Christian vs atheist debate, induction and God, morality without God, Christian logic defense, secular humanism debunked, atheism worldview flaws, uniformity of nature, Jesus and science, defending faith with logic, apologetics for men, biblical foundations of science, worldview presuppositions, presuppositional apologetics debate, Christian vs atheist worldview, transcendental argument for God (TAG), atheism refuted by logic, science presupposes Christianity, Mark Reid Joel Settecase debate, how atheists borrow from God, Christian foundations of science, laws of logic and God’s existence, biblical worldview vs naturalism, Van Tilian apologetics explained, defending faith with reason, logical argument for Christianity, Jesus and the scientific method, exposing atheist inconsistencies, Christian response to secular humanism, why atheism fails, internal critique of atheism, biblical epistemology defense, God and the uniformity of nature, can atheists justify induction, Christian apologetics for laymen, ultimate proof of God debate, logic morality and science need God, Hammer and Anvil Society apologeticsComment
"Why Do You Believe In God, When Science Contradicts Him?"
"Why Do You Believe In God, When Science Contradicts Him?"

Can atheists account for the laws of science they rely on? In this hard-hitting article, Joel Settecase shows why every scientific experiment presupposes the God of the Bible. From fossils to falling coffee cups, discover how science only makes sense in a world created and upheld by Jesus Christ—and why atheism is standing on nothing. A must-read for Christian men who want to think biblically and defend their faith confidently.

Read More
ApologeticsJoel SettecaseChristian apologetics, presuppositional apologetics, science and God, biblical worldview, uniformity of nature, atheism vs Christianity, evidence for God, Noah’s flood, inductive reasoning, Christian worldview and scienceComment
The Pot, the Preconditions, and the Problem with Atheism
The Pot, the Preconditions, and the Problem with Atheism

Atheism borrows tools it can’t explain. In this debate, I challenged an agnostic atheist to account for logic, science, and morality without God—and when pressed, he had to invent universe-making aliens. This article unpacks why only the Christian worldview supplies the necessary preconditions of intelligibility—and why denying that ends in absurdity.

Read More
Apologetics, ArticlesJoel Settecasepresuppositional apologetics, Christian worldview, atheism vs Christianity, laws of logic, morality without God, uniformity of nature, transcendental argument, impossibility of the contrary, agnostic atheist debate, grounding for logic, biblical epistemology, Van Til apologetics, Joel Settecase debate, Christian apologetics blog, defending the faith, intelligibility and God, presuppositionalism explained, debate with atheist, Christian logic and reason, truth and the Bible, Presuppositional Apologetics books, Presuppositional apologetics vs classical apologetics, Presuppositional apologetics definition, Presuppositional apologetics PDF, Presuppositional apologetics reddit, Presuppositional definition, Presuppositional apologetics criticism, Presuppositional apologetics examplesComment